Claude and ChatGPT both have web search built in. Combine that with the Klarity MCP and you get gap analysis that would take a human days to assemble. The pattern: Klarity tells the assistant what you actually do. Web research tells it what you should be doing. The gap writes itself.Documentation Index
Fetch the complete documentation index at: https://developers.klarity.ai/llms.txt
Use this file to discover all available pages before exploring further.
Example prompts
| Prompt | What you get |
|---|---|
| ”Look at our accounts payable process and research industry best practices — where are we behind?” | Your actual process graph measured against published frameworks |
| ”Compare our vendor onboarding to what Gartner recommends for companies our size.” | Analyst-grade benchmarking grounded in your specific process definitions |
| ”Research how leading companies automate the manual steps in our order-to-cash flow.” | Targeted research pinpointed to your specific bottlenecks and manual handoffs |
| ”What compliance frameworks apply to our data handling processes, and are we meeting them?” | Cross-reference your documented controls with current regulatory guidance |
| ”What are the emerging risks in our industry for processes that involve PII handling?” | Threat landscape analysis mapped to your actual process surface area |
Recipe
Ground in the workspace first
Call
search → fetch → get_process_details to read the current state of the target process.Surface the actual pain pattern
Call
get_process_observations and get_observation_activity_timeline — your real deviations, not assumed ones.Pull external context
Use the client’s web search (or
research_web if you need it inside the MCP loop) to gather published frameworks, vendor positioning, or regulatory guidance.Watch for
- Don’t anchor on web findings alone. The workspace is the ground truth. If a benchmark contradicts what observations show, the benchmark is the hypothesis.
- Cite both sources. Process IDs, observation timestamps, and source URLs side by side. That’s what makes the gap analysis defensible.